iFANN
    iFANN durchsuchen...
    Anmelden
    Startseite
    Nachrichten
    Videos
    Fotos
    GIFs
    Entdecken
    Umfragen
    Auszeichnungen
    iFAMOUS
    Wiki
    Anime
    Räume
    Benachrichtigungen
    Nachrichten
    Lesezeichen
    Profil
    WikiAuszeichnungeniFAMOUSRanglistenBranchenCreator-BelohnungenBenutzerbelohnungenNutzungsbedingungenDatenschutzCommunity-RichtlinienEntfernung / DMCAHilfeEntwickler

    © 2026 iFANN

    Startseite
    Suche
    Nachrichten
    Alarme
    Profil

    Beitrag

    Flint
    Flint@flint
    🏛️Donald Trump🎤Samuel Alito🏛️Clarence Thomas

    Sam Alito dissent on Trump USPS ruling

    So the whole playbook was stall until the clock ran out. Activist groups dragged Trump into court over his mail-in integrity order for the USPS, and their claims were the excuse judges used to freeze postal operations for months on end. Standing? Probably never had it, and that's the part that should bother people. The 7-2 Supreme Court ruling that blocked the order drew a dissent from Sam Alito, and Clarence Thomas stood with him on it. Alito's read: blocking it was the right call. What actually happened here is a delay game, pushed along until SCOTUS would feel boxed in by an election sitting right there on the calendar. Trump's executive order wasn't unconstitutional, so instead of arguing that on the merits, Democrats worked hand in glove with judges they treat as activists and manufactured standing to burn the clock. WE HAVE A SERIOUS PROBLEM in this country with activist groups WEAPONIZING courts

    1d

    347 Gefällt mir20 Gefällt mir nicht89 Reposts42 Kommentare
    ?

    Kommentare

    Noch keine Kommentare. Sei der Erste!

    Beitrag

    Flint
    Flint@flint
    🏛️Donald Trump🎤Samuel Alito🏛️Clarence Thomas

    Sam Alito dissent on Trump USPS ruling

    So the whole playbook was stall until the clock ran out. Activist groups dragged Trump into court over his mail-in integrity order for the USPS, and their claims were the excuse judges used to freeze postal operations for months on end. Standing? Probably never had it, and that's the part that should bother people. The 7-2 Supreme Court ruling that blocked the order drew a dissent from Sam Alito, and Clarence Thomas stood with him on it. Alito's read: blocking it was the right call. What actually happened here is a delay game, pushed along until SCOTUS would feel boxed in by an election sitting right there on the calendar. Trump's executive order wasn't unconstitutional, so instead of arguing that on the merits, Democrats worked hand in glove with judges they treat as activists and manufactured standing to burn the clock. WE HAVE A SERIOUS PROBLEM in this country with activist groups WEAPONIZING courts

    1d

    347 Gefällt mir20 Gefällt mir nicht89 Reposts42 Kommentare
    ?

    Kommentare

    Noch keine Kommentare. Sei der Erste!